+! for incubator-freemarker-online-tester
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote: > > > I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to > > say what it is. > > So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid > of long names... :) ) > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I will request a Git repo for the evaluator service. Then I will ask > >> Kenshoo to submit an ICLA, and make a pull request on that repository. > >> > >> What should be the name of the repository? If nobody says otherwise, > >> it will be incubating-freemarker-online. (See our currently existing > >> repos here: http://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html) > >> > >> > >> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> > >> > Done, good news :) > >> > > >> > Jacques > >> > > >> > > >> > Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >> >> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to > >> >> ASF. Does someone want to help out with the paper work, like sending > >> >> them the file to fill and sign and post, etc.? > >> >> > >> >> I have also posted to INFRA-13246 about this, but couldn't change the > >> >> status to "wariting for infra". Jacques, do you have the right to do > >> >> that? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >> >>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >> >>>>>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will > have > >> >>>>>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be > the > >> >>>>>> other way around then. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Anyway, have you seen and reactions on our proposal? In case you > >> have > >> >>>>>> met someone face to face or something... > >> >>>>> I must say I'm reluctant to push the request more w/o nothing in > >> >>>>> hand, or at least nothing more to say (like we contacted them, we > >> begin to work on > >> >>>>> it, etc., ie some action engaged) > >> >>>> OK, I will ask Kenshoo (the owner of freemarker-online) now... > >> >>> Thanks I'm sure this will help > >> >>> > >> >>> Jacques > >> >>> > >> >>>>> Jacques > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> It would help to push INFRA-13246 > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Thanks > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Jacques > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >> >>>>>>>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if > we > >> can > >> >>>>>>>> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden > for > >> >>>>>>>> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's > >> just > >> >>>>>>>> good PR. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the > >> site/service: > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker > >> template by > >> >>>>>>>>>> providing the template code and its context. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service > to > >> the users > >> >>>>>>>>>> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a > >> very useful > >> >>>>>>>>>> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is an interest in this community then we could move > in > >> two > >> >>>>>>>>>> directions: > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and > >> see if they > >> >>>>>>>>>> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our > >> community and help > >> >>>>>>>>>> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then > we > >> could > >> >>>>>>>>>> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the > possibility > >> to set up a > >> >>>>>>>>>> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use > >> to deploy a > >> >>>>>>>>>> similar service, from our official website > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any > >> volunteers for > >> >>>>>>>>>> #2 (or even #1)? > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Jacopo > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for > OFBiz > >> >>>>>>>>> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this > >> task. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Jacques > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Daniel Dekany > >> > >> > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >
