On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Barrie Selack <[email protected]> wrote: > +! for incubator-freemarker-online-tester
+1. Me too. Regards, Woonsan > > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote: >> >> > I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to >> > say what it is. >> >> So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid >> of long names... :) ) >> >> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> I will request a Git repo for the evaluator service. Then I will ask >> >> Kenshoo to submit an ICLA, and make a pull request on that repository. >> >> >> >> What should be the name of the repository? If nobody says otherwise, >> >> it will be incubating-freemarker-online. (See our currently existing >> >> repos here: http://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html) >> >> >> >> >> >> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >> >> > Done, good news :) >> >> > >> >> > Jacques >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to >> >> >> ASF. Does someone want to help out with the paper work, like sending >> >> >> them the file to fill and sign and post, etc.? >> >> >> >> >> >> I have also posted to INFRA-13246 about this, but couldn't change the >> >> >> status to "wariting for infra". Jacques, do you have the right to do >> >> >> that? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >>>>>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will >> have >> >> >>>>>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be >> the >> >> >>>>>> other way around then. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Anyway, have you seen and reactions on our proposal? In case you >> >> have >> >> >>>>>> met someone face to face or something... >> >> >>>>> I must say I'm reluctant to push the request more w/o nothing in >> >> >>>>> hand, or at least nothing more to say (like we contacted them, we >> >> begin to work on >> >> >>>>> it, etc., ie some action engaged) >> >> >>>> OK, I will ask Kenshoo (the owner of freemarker-online) now... >> >> >>> Thanks I'm sure this will help >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Jacques >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Jacques >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them? >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> It would help to push INFRA-13246 >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Jacques >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >>>>>>>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if >> we >> >> can >> >> >>>>>>>> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden >> for >> >> >>>>>>>> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's >> >> just >> >> >>>>>>>> good PR. >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the >> >> site/service: >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker >> >> template by >> >> >>>>>>>>>> providing the template code and its context. >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service >> to >> >> the users >> >> >>>>>>>>>> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a >> >> very useful >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is an interest in this community then we could move >> in >> >> two >> >> >>>>>>>>>> directions: >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and >> >> see if they >> >> >>>>>>>>>> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our >> >> community and help >> >> >>>>>>>>>> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then >> we >> >> could >> >> >>>>>>>>>> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the >> possibility >> >> to set up a >> >> >>>>>>>>>> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use >> >> to deploy a >> >> >>>>>>>>>> similar service, from our official website >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any >> >> volunteers for >> >> >>>>>>>>>> #2 (or even #1)? >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for >> OFBiz >> >> >>>>>>>>> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this >> >> task. >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >>
