Hi Daniel,
Inline...
Le 13/11/2017 à 23:14, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Monday, November 13, 2017, 8:58:51 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
No idea why that thread is not in my inbox.
Anyway I still have the same idea of keeping around the project if my
support can be helpful, technically or whatever.
That's good news, thanks! Of course it can be helpful, like to check
releases sometimes, as we need 3 votes.
As of this thread... I know that we have
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model,
and according that everything is fine formally, but it isn't. I ran
through some documents on the weekend, and found and fixed a few
smaller problems on the home page.
I had a look at this wiki page and it sounds quite good to me, nothing missing
or needed to be amended now?
I have also noticed (but not fixed)
that we have no DOAP file
(https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#metadata), and somewhere
I have read that that's needed for graduation (can't find where now).
I can create the DOAP file based on my experience with OFBiz:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf
Where would you suggest to put it? What would be the equivalent of
<shortdesc xml:lang="en">Apache OFBiz is an open source enterprise automation
software project</shortdesc>
<description>
Apache OFBiz is an open source product for the automation of enterprise
processes that includes framework components and business applications
for ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), CRM (Customer Relationship
Management), E-Business / E-Commerce, SCM (Supply Chain Management),
MRP (Manufacturing Resource Planning), MMS/EAM (Maintenance Management
System/Enterprise Asset Management).
Apache OFBiz provides a foundation and starting point for reliable,
secure and scalable enterprise solutions.
</description>
<programming-language>Java</programming-language>
<category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/http"; />
?
The rest I think I can take care of, or ask more if needed...
Jacques
And that's just what I have noticed, and I haven't read through all
documents yet. So can someone else also run through things?
On Nov 8, 2017 23:17, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote:
Thursday, November 9, 2017, 3:05:26 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Sorry, I can't find that thread...
And I can't link to that, as I have no right to use
https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/freemarker-private/.
But it doesn't mater. The question was that if FreeMarker graduates,
will you stay in the FreeMarker PMC? (One year ago or so you said that
you would, but I wanted that to be reassured.)
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
wrote:
Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 6:48:07 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Nothing really that I can see. We should go for discusion seriously
and
voting towards graduation ;-)
There are the things quoted below. Also, please look at the private
list (there was a question if you still intend to remain in the PMC
after graduation).
On Nov 7, 2017 20:02, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote:
So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home
page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?).
What's
next? Anyone?
Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
+1 for the migration.
And right after that I think we should start the graduation
process.
Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27
before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.)
Related:
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/
Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model
- http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html:
Here some dates are year only.
- https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker:
This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has
licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow.
Jacopo
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany <
[email protected]>
wrote:
As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up
again
and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org
now.
Also
to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO),
also I
hear
that starting from October they want to show warning in
Chrome if
you
have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page
under
http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
That would be great, thanks!
Jacques
Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do
it
yet.
But I should be able to start this week, most likely
Monday...
No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
Jacques
Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be
available
before November
I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far
all
seems
OK :)
The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our
site,
so
no
problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed,
for
now.)
Thanks for the checking the release!
I should also point out that in the last board report the
issue of
freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/>
web
site came up. I would suggest that the project make that
transition
sooner than later if graduation is desired.
Ralph
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
