Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 6:48:07 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:

> Nothing really that I can see. We should go for discusion seriously and
> voting towards graduation ;-)

There are the things quoted below. Also, please look at the private
list (there was a question if you still intend to remain in the PMC
after graduation).

> On Nov 7, 2017 20:02, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home
>> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). What's
>> next? Anyone?
>>
>>
>> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
>> > Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 for the migration.
>> >> And right after that I think we should start the graduation process.
>> >
>> > Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27
>> > before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.)
>> >
>> > Related:
>> >
>> > -
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/
>> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model
>> >
>> > - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html:
>> >   Here some dates are year only.
>> >
>> > - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker:
>> >   This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has
>> >   licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow.
>> >
>> >> Jacopo
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
>> >>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
>> >>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> >>> >>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> >>> >>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> >>> >>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I
>> hear
>> >>> >>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in
>> Chrome if
>> >>> you
>> >>> >>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>> >>> >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>> >>> >>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
>> >>> >>>>>> That would be great, thanks!
>> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>> Jacques
>> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it
>> yet.
>> >>> >>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>> >>> >>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Jacques
>> >>> >>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be
>> available
>> >>> before November
>> >>> >>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all
>> seems
>> >>> OK :)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so
>> no
>> >>> >> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for
>> now.)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thanks for the checking the release!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
>> >>> > freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web
>> >>> > site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
>> >>> > sooner than later if graduation is desired.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Ralph
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>  Daniel Dekany
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>  Daniel Dekany
>>
>>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Reply via email to