Monday, November 13, 2017, 8:58:51 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > No idea why that thread is not in my inbox. > > Anyway I still have the same idea of keeping around the project if my > support can be helpful, technically or whatever.
That's good news, thanks! Of course it can be helpful, like to check releases sometimes, as we need 3 votes. As of this thread... I know that we have https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model, and according that everything is fine formally, but it isn't. I ran through some documents on the weekend, and found and fixed a few smaller problems on the home page. I have also noticed (but not fixed) that we have no DOAP file (https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#metadata), and somewhere I have read that that's needed for graduation (can't find where now). And that's just what I have noticed, and I haven't read through all documents yet. So can someone else also run through things? > On Nov 8, 2017 23:17, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thursday, November 9, 2017, 3:05:26 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> > Sorry, I can't find that thread... >> >> And I can't link to that, as I have no right to use >> https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/freemarker-private/. >> But it doesn't mater. The question was that if FreeMarker graduates, >> will you stay in the FreeMarker PMC? (One year ago or so you said that >> you would, but I wanted that to be reassured.) >> >> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Wednesday, November 8, 2017, 6:48:07 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> >> >> > Nothing really that I can see. We should go for discusion seriously >> and >> >> > voting towards graduation ;-) >> >> >> >> There are the things quoted below. Also, please look at the private >> >> list (there was a question if you still intend to remain in the PMC >> >> after graduation). >> >> >> >> > On Nov 7, 2017 20:02, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> So, we have released 2.3.27, and has changed the domain of the home >> >> >> page (not of try.freemarker.org though... is that a problem?). >> What's >> >> >> next? Anyone? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Monday, October 23, 2017, 3:18:54 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:04:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> +1 for the migration. >> >> >> >> And right after that I think we should start the graduation >> process. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Agreed regarding graduation. (We certainly should release 2.3.27 >> >> >> > before that, but it's very close anyway, hopefully.) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Related: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - >> >> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/ >> >> >> Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html: >> >> >> > Here some dates are year only. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker: >> >> >> > This has some glitches, like it states "No Release Yet/Binary has >> >> >> > licensing issues"... will have to update this somehow. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up >> >> again >> >> >> >>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org >> now. >> >> Also >> >> >> >>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >> >>> >>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >> >>> >>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), >> >> also I >> >> >> hear >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in >> >> >> Chrome if >> >> >> >>> you >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page >> >> under >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form. >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this? >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October. >> >> >> >>> >>>>>> That would be great, thanks! >> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> Jacques >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do >> it >> >> >> yet. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely >> Monday... >> >> >> >>> >>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed! >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Jacques >> >> >> >>> >>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be >> >> >> available >> >> >> >>> before November >> >> >> >>> >>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far >> all >> >> >> seems >> >> >> >>> OK :) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our >> site, >> >> so >> >> >> no >> >> >> >>> >> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, >> for >> >> >> now.) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Thanks for the checking the release! >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > I should also point out that in the last board report the >> issue of >> >> >> >>> > freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> >> web >> >> >> >>> > site came up. I would suggest that the project make that >> >> transition >> >> >> >>> > sooner than later if graduation is desired. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Ralph >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >>> Thanks, >> >> >> >>> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
