+1 for Gitbox This will greatly simplify the workflow committers go through with pull requests from the community. It will also allow us to close out pulls that go dark. On our local repos we would really have no need to ever include the apache repo so it reduces the number of remotes we need to track.
-Jake Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > > Hi! > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > some time. > > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > Thanks, > Roman.
