I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty much all
contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we might as
well make it easier for us to manage things in github.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git (for
> Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words, after I
> commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in the
> GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour.
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > Hi!
> > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
> > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
> > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
> > some time.
> > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
> > repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
> > have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
> > Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
> > but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
> > you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
> > have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.