Ticket created, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14876
Lets see where it goes... --Mark On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Mark, if you want the experience for the next repo you should do it. > Thanks! > > -Jake > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 14, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Ernest Burghardt <eburgha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > Mark, Go ahead and file it and geode-native will be the canaries... > > > > Thanks, > > Ernie > > > >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Since we have people wanting this and need a small experiment group to > >> blaze the trail for us, I think the geode-native would be a good choice > >> since it has active PRs and commits. Looks like the process to migrate > from > >> Git@ASF to GitHub is to create an INFRA ticket with type 'Gitbox > Request'. > >> > >> Jake, do you want to file the ticket or I can do it? > >> > >> --Mark > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Well, I am not seeing any -1 votes for this switch. Let's make the > >> change. > >>> > >>> Any takers for following up with Inra to make this go? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:49 PM Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 for Gitbox > >>>> > >>>> This will greatly simplify the workflow committers go through with > pull > >>>> requests from the community. It will also allow us to close out pulls > >>> that > >>>> go dark. On our local repos we would really have no need to ever > >> include > >>>> the apache repo so it reduces the number of remotes we need to track. > >>>> > >>>> -Jake > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> > >>>>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > >>>>> some time. > >>>>> > >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > >>>>> > >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Roman. > >>>> > >>> > >> >
