+1 I'm interested to see how it works for geode-site, which has a sorta quirky build/branch structure.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > > some time. > > > > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > > repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > > have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > > > Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > > but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > > you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > > have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we > ready to convert the other repos? > > - geode > - geode-site > - geode-examples > > I think we should. > > Anthony >
