+1 to prioritizing quality over releasing on the desired cadence. The quarterly release cadence is a good goal, but it shouldn't be a strict rule if there is more work to be done to ensure good quality.
Ryan On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > IMHO we start release work based on a quarterly schedule and we finish it > based on meeting quality goals. So right now I’m less worried about when > the release will be done (because uncertainty) and more focused on ensuring > we have demonstrated stability on the release branch. Hopefully that will > happen sooner than 4/1…but it could take longer too. > > Anthony > > > > On Feb 28, 2019, at 6:00 PM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > According to our wiki we were aiming for a March 1st release date for our > > 1.9 release. We cut the release branch about two weeks late and see > unusual > > amounts of merges still going into the branch. I propose that we give > > ourselves some more time to validate what's there. My proposal is to aim > > for last week of March or maybe even week of April 1st. > > > > What do you all think? > >
