I think this is exactly the right balance. Yay! -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead Mobile: +1-631-835-4771
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:48 AM Ryan McMahon <rmcma...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 to prioritizing quality over releasing on the desired cadence. The > quarterly release cadence is a good goal, but it shouldn't be a strict rule > if there is more work to be done to ensure good quality. > > Ryan > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > IMHO we start release work based on a quarterly schedule and we finish it > > based on meeting quality goals. So right now I’m less worried about when > > the release will be done (because uncertainty) and more focused on > ensuring > > we have demonstrated stability on the release branch. Hopefully that > will > > happen sooner than 4/1…but it could take longer too. > > > > Anthony > > > > > > > On Feb 28, 2019, at 6:00 PM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > According to our wiki we were aiming for a March 1st release date for > our > > > 1.9 release. We cut the release branch about two weeks late and see > > unusual > > > amounts of merges still going into the branch. I propose that we give > > > ourselves some more time to validate what's there. My proposal is to > aim > > > for last week of March or maybe even week of April 1st. > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > >
