On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:47AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would suggest having most work in the github world, and a published > > method for new contributors to do a normal github fork and pull approach. > > Contributors can then use a process to migrate that to apache git once it > > is approved for merge. That allows use of the github infra for review and > > a public face where, at the moment, people would expect it to be. > > I would strongly advise against that. > > All of the discussion should happen on the ASF mailing lists or other > infrastructure-supported tools. > > We should not be having discussions solely within the GitHub > infrastructure. One of the key lockins is that GitHub does not > support exporting those comments on a PR - so, when GitHub disappears > (which it will eventually), all of that information will be lost. > > If Geode simply wanted to be a GitHub project, it didn't need to come to > Apache. > > My $.02. -- justin
Absolutely. Source of the data - code, mail-list, docs - should originate from the ASF infrastructure. I am happy to provide some links to the discussions where this point has been explained at lengths on Ignite dev@ list. Cos
