+1 for gsh On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 21/05/2015 01:24, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > gsh - G SHell - Geode SHell (my vote) > > > > > > > > > > gash - Geode Again SHell (nod to bash) > > Definitely not that. > > > > gctl - Geode ConTroL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > Jacob Barrett > > > > Enterprise Architect > > > > Pivotal > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > 503-533-3763 > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Wes Williams <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> The problem with leaving it as "gfsh" is that you already have a "gfsh" > >> symbol link that points to a _gemfire_ installation. If you name the > geode > >> shell distribution as "gfsh", then when you need to switch from geode to > >> gemfire you will have to have a mechanism to overwrite or update the > >> _gemfire_ shell "gfsh" with the _geode_ shell "gfsh". Then when you go > >> back to geode you will need a reverse mechanism to update the _geode_ > shell > >> "gfsh" with the _gemfire_ shell "gfsh". This is what I face daily and > why > >> I named it something other than "gfsh", which installs in the bin > directory. > >> I just want everyone to understand the ramifications of keeping it the > same > >> name for those of us who use both. > >> Regards, > >> *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* > >> 781.606.0325 > >> http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire > >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Not all names have to be logical right? *Stares blankly* > >>> > >>> Anthony > >>> > >>> > >>>> On May 20, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I think we should just leave it as gfsh. If anyone asks what the F > >>> stands for, just stare at them blankly :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> or Geode's Fabulous SHell? > >>>> > >>>> -Dan > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Gregory Chase <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> How about change it to "G-Shell", assuming the tool versions are same > >>> for both Geode and GemFire... > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, John Blum <[email protected] <mailto: > >>> [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> This came up in last night's PJUG meeting (** Unleashing the Silicon > >>> Forest > >>>> Fire: the open sourcing of GemFire **) here in PDX. > >>>> > >>>> In Pivotal GemFire, the tool is called Gfsh (pronounced "G-fish", > meaning > >>>> GemFire Shell). > >>>> > >>>> Perhaps, we can call the Apache Geode "Shell" tool... "GOSH". > >>>> > >>>> I would say "geosh", but that is 5 letters and sounds related to > >>> geography, > >>>> compared to "gfsh" being 4 letters, therefore... "gosh"! > >>>> > >>>> ;-) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> -John > >>>> 503-504-8657 <tel:503-504-8657> > >>>> john.blum10101 (skype) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Greg Chase > >>>> > >>>> Director of Product Marketing | Big Data > >>>> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data <http://www.pivotal.io/big-data> > >>>> > >>>> Pivotal Software > >>>> http://www.pivotal.io/ <http://www.pivotal.io/> > >>>> > >>>> 650-215-0477 <tel:650-215-0477> > >>>> @GregChase > >>>> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ <http://geekmarketing.biz/> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > > -- > > [key:62590808] > -- Regards, Tushar Khairnar
