-1 no thanks.

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> How about GEodeInteractiveSHell or geisha ? ;)
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:33AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
>> >Here's my $0.02:
>> >
>> >I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
>> >
>> >
>> >    - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
>> >    management scripts
>> >    - It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > explicit =
>> >    good
>> >    - Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone.  (think
>> >    about troubleshooting classpath for gfsh vs gsh)
>> >    - We have 50+ developers with gfsh on a PC classpath.  We don't want to
>> >    teach them gsh vs. gfsh
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Brian -
>> >
>> >On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, pulkit chandra <[email protected]>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>+1 Gsh.
>> >>
>> >>If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) .
>> >>
>> >>Best Regards,
>> >>*Pulkit Chandra*
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi <[email protected]>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>+1 for gsh
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Regards,
>> >>>Namrata
>> >>>
>> >>>On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar
>> >>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>+1 for gsh
>> >>>>+1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH ;-))
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Thanks,
>> >>>>Roman.
>> >>>>
>>



-- 
Catherine Johnson | GemFire Product Management | Pivotal
+1.503.704.1933 | [email protected]

Reply via email to