Hi Niall!

sorry I got distracted by other stuff at $DAYJOB

Since it seems like my changes of bringing website source
into the repo received positive feedback I'll merge that
and will take care of your feedback tomorrow (Fri).

Sorry for the delay.

Thanks,
Roman.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The download page is still encouraging people to download a nightly build.
> Please can someone remove this asap - its been over a week now.
>
> Thanks
>
> Niall
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[email protected]
>> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Niall Pemberton
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Website looks good. I have a couple of comments:
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking a look at it!
>>>
>>> > 1. Branding
>>> >     * Incubator disclaimer is missing
>>> >     * Incubator logo is missing
>>> >     * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
>>> >     * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html
>>>
>>> Do you think that the current footer on each page is insufficient?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, its insufficient - it needs to be the standard incubating disclaimer:
>>     * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
>>
>>
>> We can add a standard disclaimer there.
>>>
>>
>> OK
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > 2. Download Page
>>> > The policy page says don't encourage people to download nightly builds
>>> on
>>> > the website:
>>> >     *  http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>>>
>>> Would it better if we moved it to under community? While
>>> we shouldn't advertise it to end users, we should make it
>>> visible to the developer community. After all, these are the
>>> folks who we can rely on to send us feedback based on
>>> the nightly builds.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it should only be where people likely to contribute would look  (see
>> http://s.apache.org/nightly)
>>
>>
>>
>>> > I also think there needs to be more progress on the incubating due
>>> > diligence tasks before offering builds to download. For example:
>>> >    * addressing the jgroups LGPL issue
>>> >    * source file headers (see GEODE-18)
>>> >    * including the LICENSE, NOTICE & DISCLAIMER in the build artifacts
>>> >    * Cryptography Review (see GEODE-25)
>>>
>>> Absolutely agreed!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to