On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Niall! > > sorry I got distracted by other stuff at $DAYJOB > > Since it seems like my changes of bringing website source > into the repo received positive feedback I'll merge that > and will take care of your feedback tomorrow (Fri). > Thanks for taking care of this Roman Niall > > Sorry for the delay. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Niall Pemberton > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The download page is still encouraging people to download a nightly > build. > > Please can someone remove this asap - its been over a week now. > > > > Thanks > > > > Niall > > > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Niall Pemberton < > [email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Niall Pemberton > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > Website looks good. I have a couple of comments: > >>> > >>> Thanks for taking a look at it! > >>> > >>> > 1. Branding > >>> > * Incubator disclaimer is missing > >>> > * Incubator logo is missing > >>> > * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html > >>> > * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html > >>> > >>> Do you think that the current footer on each page is insufficient? > >>> > >> > >> Yes, its insufficient - it needs to be the standard incubating > disclaimer: > >> * http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers > >> > >> > >> We can add a standard disclaimer there. > >>> > >> > >> OK > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > 2. Download Page > >>> > The policy page says don't encourage people to download nightly > builds > >>> on > >>> > the website: > >>> > * http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what > >>> > >>> Would it better if we moved it to under community? While > >>> we shouldn't advertise it to end users, we should make it > >>> visible to the developer community. After all, these are the > >>> folks who we can rely on to send us feedback based on > >>> the nightly builds. > >>> > >> > >> Yes, it should only be where people likely to contribute would look > (see > >> http://s.apache.org/nightly) > >> > >> > >> > >>> > I also think there needs to be more progress on the incubating due > >>> > diligence tasks before offering builds to download. For example: > >>> > * addressing the jgroups LGPL issue > >>> > * source file headers (see GEODE-18) > >>> > * including the LICENSE, NOTICE & DISCLAIMER in the build > artifacts > >>> > * Cryptography Review (see GEODE-25) > >>> > >>> Absolutely agreed! > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Roman. > >>> > >> > >> >
