> On June 24, 2015, 12:35 a.m., Kirk Lund wrote:
> > Ship It!

Issues were dropped because we're opening separate ticket to fix the "help" 
feature in the Locator/ServerLaunchers.


- Kirk


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35542/#review89105
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2015, 6:10 a.m., William Markito wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35542/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2015, 6:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Darrel Schneider and Kirk Lund.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-51
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-51
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> hostname-for-clients property was being ignored by server startup, preventing 
> external clients to connect to the cache servers after connecting to the 
> locator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/ServerLauncher.java
>  d5db59d 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/ServerLauncher.java
>  d5db59d 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/i18n/LocalizedStrings.java
>  d5ea8ab 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/internal/cli/commands/LauncherLifecycleCommands.java
>  68b2483 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/ServerLauncherJUnitTest.java
>  5af33e1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35542/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Passed all JUnit tests.
> Manual verification using Docker-composer example.
> JMX MBean values are OK.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> GEODE-51.patch v2
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/06/20/01916fb1-9f7d-4847-8a10-59a9ac0824c5__GEODE-51.patch
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> William Markito
> 
>

Reply via email to