Annotations are utilities…? The gemfire-junit name seems unnecessarily restrictive. Currently it only contains annotations related to junit tests.
Hadoop defines both hadoop-annotations and hadoop-common. Anthony > On Sep 11, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Jacob Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1 > > > > > Reserve common for things common to geode development not related to unit > testing. Like utilities classes. > > > > > Jacob Barrett > Manager > GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE) > Pivotal > > [email protected] > 503-533-3763 > > For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at > http://support.pivotal.io/ > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I filed ticket GEODE-327 to propose renaming gemfire-junit to >> gemfire-common. >> We'd like to be able to define common annotations in this gemfire-common >> and not be limited to code that is specific to junit or testing. The first >> annotation would be Experimental (see GEODE-328). >> Please vote on making this change. >> Thanks, >> Kirk
