Yes, I was originally envisioning creation of a src/main with: src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/annotations/Experimental.java
Currently, the purpose of gemfire-junit is to have zero dependencies on other subprojects but provide (currently testing related only) annotations and classes that are used by all the other subprojects. We couldn't place these classes in gemfire-core because that would result in bi-directional/circular dependencies between subprojects. -Kirk On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Sai Boorlagadda <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we have ‘src/main’ and ‘src/test’ in proposed gemfire-common and build > a gemfire-common-test.jar? So we can separate test utilities from common > gemfire utilities. > > cloudfoundry/UAA…does it with a common-test.jar and other modules with in > UAA extend/use common test classes. > > Sai > > > On Sep 12, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Annotations are utilities…? The gemfire-junit name seems unnecessarily > restrictive. Currently it only contains annotations related to junit tests. > > > > Hadoop defines both hadoop-annotations and hadoop-common. > > > > Anthony > > > > > >> On Sep 11, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Jacob Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> -1 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Reserve common for things common to geode development not related to > unit testing. Like utilities classes. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Jacob Barrett > >> Manager > >> GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE) > >> Pivotal > >> > >> [email protected] > >> 503-533-3763 > >> > >> For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at > http://support.pivotal.io/ > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> I filed ticket GEODE-327 to propose renaming gemfire-junit to > >>> gemfire-common. > >>> We'd like to be able to define common annotations in this > gemfire-common > >>> and not be limited to code that is specific to junit or testing. The > first > >>> annotation would be Experimental (see GEODE-328). > >>> Please vote on making this change. > >>> Thanks, > >>> Kirk > > > >
