Can we have ‘src/main’ and ‘src/test’ in proposed gemfire-common and build a gemfire-common-test.jar? So we can separate test utilities from common gemfire utilities.
cloudfoundry/UAA…does it with a common-test.jar and other modules with in UAA extend/use common test classes. Sai > On Sep 12, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Annotations are utilities…? The gemfire-junit name seems unnecessarily > restrictive. Currently it only contains annotations related to junit tests. > > Hadoop defines both hadoop-annotations and hadoop-common. > > Anthony > > >> On Sep 11, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Jacob Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> >> >> >> Reserve common for things common to geode development not related to unit >> testing. Like utilities classes. >> >> >> >> >> Jacob Barrett >> Manager >> GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE) >> Pivotal >> >> [email protected] >> 503-533-3763 >> >> For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at >> http://support.pivotal.io/ >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I filed ticket GEODE-327 to propose renaming gemfire-junit to >>> gemfire-common. >>> We'd like to be able to define common annotations in this gemfire-common >>> and not be limited to code that is specific to junit or testing. The first >>> annotation would be Experimental (see GEODE-328). >>> Please vote on making this change. >>> Thanks, >>> Kirk >
