This is done. The HDFS related changes are gone from develop and are now on
their own feature branch - feature/GEODE-10.

-Dan

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
> a possible HDFS integration should also be an optional jar plugin package
> in the distribution as Fred started the discussion to split jars anyway.
>
> Best Regards
> Manuel Birke
>
> Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc.
> Address: 309 N Pastoria Ave | Sunnyvale, CA 94085
> Mobile: +1 408-203-6026
> Phone: +1 408-991-6502
> ________________________________
> From: Anilkumar Gingade<mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: ‎3/‎19/‎2016 0:05
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with the partial HDFS related code on
> develop?
>
> +1
> Good idea...It will allow us to re-visit the HDFS implementation and right
> way to provide this support...
>
> -Anil.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > When geode was donated to apache, there was a partially completed
> > integration with HDFS built in. See GEODE-10.
> >
> > Since that initial donation, we have removed the APIs related to creating
> > HDFS regions because they were not yet stable. See GEODE-429.
> >
> > The problem is that we still have HDFS related code sprinkled throughout
> > geode-core. This causes us to pull in a bunch of compile dependencies on
> > hbase and hadoop.
> >
> > I already created an issue, GEODE-1072, to move the HDFS code it it's own
> > subproject, but that will take a lot of work.
> >
> > In the mean time, I propose we go ahead and create a separate branch for
> > the HDFS related changes and remove the HDFS related code from develop.
> The
> > work to refactor the HDFS integration to be a subproject can take place
> on
> > that branch and geode-core on develop will be cleaner in the mean time.
> >
> > What do you folks think?
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
> If you are not the addressee, please inform us immediately that you have
> received this e-mail by mistake, and delete it. We thank you for your
> support.
>
>

Reply via email to