This is a topic we didn't cover at Geode Summit. We could bring it up at a Geode Clubhouse if anyone is interested.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > This is done. The HDFS related changes are gone from develop and are now on > their own feature branch - feature/GEODE-10. > > -Dan > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > a possible HDFS integration should also be an optional jar plugin package > > in the distribution as Fred started the discussion to split jars anyway. > > > > Best Regards > > Manuel Birke > > > > Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc. > > Address: 309 N Pastoria Ave | Sunnyvale, CA 94085 > > Mobile: +1 408-203-6026 > > Phone: +1 408-991-6502 > > ________________________________ > > From: Anilkumar Gingade<mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: 3/19/2016 0:05 > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with the partial HDFS related code on > > develop? > > > > +1 > > Good idea...It will allow us to re-visit the HDFS implementation and > right > > way to provide this support... > > > > -Anil. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > When geode was donated to apache, there was a partially completed > > > integration with HDFS built in. See GEODE-10. > > > > > > Since that initial donation, we have removed the APIs related to > creating > > > HDFS regions because they were not yet stable. See GEODE-429. > > > > > > The problem is that we still have HDFS related code sprinkled > throughout > > > geode-core. This causes us to pull in a bunch of compile dependencies > on > > > hbase and hadoop. > > > > > > I already created an issue, GEODE-1072, to move the HDFS code it it's > own > > > subproject, but that will take a lot of work. > > > > > > In the mean time, I propose we go ahead and create a separate branch > for > > > the HDFS related changes and remove the HDFS related code from develop. > > The > > > work to refactor the HDFS integration to be a subproject can take place > > on > > > that branch and geode-core on develop will be cleaner in the mean time. > > > > > > What do you folks think? > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > If you are not the addressee, please inform us immediately that you have > > received this e-mail by mistake, and delete it. We thank you for your > > support. > > > > > -- Greg Chase Global Head, Big Data Communities http://www.pivotal.io/big-data Pivotal Software http://www.pivotal.io/ 650-215-0477 @GregChase Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
