> On May 2, 2016, 11:46 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> > geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPROverflow.java,
> >  line 26
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46918/diff/1/?file=1369345#file1369345line26>
> >
> >     Remove?

Will do.


> On May 2, 2016, 11:46 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> > geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesBase.java,
> >  line 101
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46918/diff/1/?file=1369343#file1369343line101>
> >
> >     For future reference, what happens if the region is a replicated 
> > region, does rebalance just get ignored?

Hmm, yeah, maybe we need a better heirarchy of tests. PR specific tests should 
be in a subclass.


- Dan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46918/#review131422
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 2, 2016, 11:43 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46918/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 2, 2016, 11:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jason Huynh, nabarun nag, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactoring this test into a framework for adding more tests with a
> bunch of subclasses.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesBase.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPR.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPROverflow.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/LuceneFunctionReadPathDUnitTest.java
>  f6fcf8a36ea73218918c93192a98c60eae83ac0b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46918/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan Smith
> 
>

Reply via email to