IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that module, that would be cool as well.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary release? > Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with 1.0.RC2 > points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ . > > What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? > > -Dan > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community time > > to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William > > Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the website > > with the docs included. > > > > Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push the current docs to > > the website. I'll also document the process in a README. > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, > let’s > > > start > > > > hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > > > > > Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and start > > > maintaining > > > it a'la Hadoop: > > > https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/ > > > ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > > > > -- ~/William