Sadly just looked at the license for wkhtmltopdf and it uses GPL 3.0.  I 
believe that would be an issue as discussed here 
<https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html>.

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> In the past I have used wkhtmltopdf to build programmatically PDFs from HTML 
> documents.  We could try using this to generate a PDF version of the docs in 
> the interim until we can generate a PDF directly from book binder.
> 
>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>> 
>> Its really important to ship pdf docs because its very difficult to search
>> otherwise.
>> 
>> --
>> Mike Stolz
>> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
>> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> @Dan: I didn't realize there was a docs link in the top-level README. We
>>> can change that for the next release, and I can look into redirecting
>>> geode.docs.pivotal.io to geode.incubator.apache.org/docs/ in the meantime,
>>> once the docs are posted there..
>>> 
>>> @William: We don't currently have a PDF for these docs. I'm researching
>>> options.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:53 PM William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs.
>>> 
>>> About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that
>>> module, that would be cool as well.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary
>>> release?
>>>> Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with
>>> 1.0.RC2
>>>> points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ .
>>>> 
>>>> What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release?
>>>> 
>>>> -Dan
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io
>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community
>>> time
>>>>> to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William
>>>>> Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the
>>> website
>>>>> with the docs included.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push the current docs
>>> to
>>>>> the website. I'll also document the process in a README.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM Roman Shaposhnik <
>>> ro...@shaposhnik.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch,
>>>> let’s
>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> hosting them on http://geode.apache.org.  Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and
>>> start
>>>>>> maintaining
>>>>>> it a'la Hadoop:
>>>>>>   https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Roman.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> ~/William
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to