Sadly just looked at the license for wkhtmltopdf and it uses GPL 3.0. I believe that would be an issue as discussed here <https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html>.
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > In the past I have used wkhtmltopdf to build programmatically PDFs from HTML > documents. We could try using this to generate a PDF version of the docs in > the interim until we can generate a PDF directly from book binder. > >> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> Its really important to ship pdf docs because its very difficult to search >> otherwise. >> >> -- >> Mike Stolz >> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager >> Mobile: 631-835-4771 >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> >> wrote: >> >>> @Dan: I didn't realize there was a docs link in the top-level README. We >>> can change that for the next release, and I can look into redirecting >>> geode.docs.pivotal.io to geode.incubator.apache.org/docs/ in the meantime, >>> once the docs are posted there.. >>> >>> @William: We don't currently have a PDF for these docs. I'm researching >>> options. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:53 PM William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>> IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. >>> >>> About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that >>> module, that would be cool as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary >>> release? >>>> Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with >>> 1.0.RC2 >>>> points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ . >>>> >>>> What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community >>> time >>>>> to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William >>>>> Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the >>> website >>>>> with the docs included. >>>>> >>>>> Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push the current docs >>> to >>>>> the website. I'll also document the process in a README. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM Roman Shaposhnik < >>> ro...@shaposhnik.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, >>>> let’s >>>>>> start >>>>>>> hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and >>> start >>>>>> maintaining >>>>>> it a'la Hadoop: >>>>>> https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/ >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Roman. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ~/William >>> >