Something we control. The CSIv2 configuration that I am using is very
hierarchical. Everything works w/ the CDATA.
Regards,
Alan
David Blevins wrote:
Is this xml for a third party piece of software or something that we
control?
-David
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I have no problem reading in the string into XML. It just looks ugly
in the plan file.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote:
I'm not sure this is such a good idea.
It's going to require changing the gbean schema to allow an any
element and mixed content in a gbean attribute element. In
principle I object strongly to mixed content. I think the extra
complications indicate that the CDATA solution is much much
simpler. Is there a problem with it? What are you trying to pass
in? What are you doing with the results? Do you want an XmlObject,
a string, a DOM element, a STAX stream...?
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
No reason other then no one ever tried it. If you want to change
the builder code, go for it.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:31 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why do I have to wrap XML in CDATA when I want to pass XML to
GBean attributes?
Regards,
Alan
