We have another 6 hours before the earliest proposed time for the branch, right?

Aaron said "none of these should hold up the branch" about the things he plans to do. Is the question whether anyone wants to take on the things in his list he doesn't want to do before the branch? I don't plan to do any of them.

I assume there are going to be a few days after the branch we can use to iron out dependency versions, tck compliance, etc?

thanks
david jencks

On Jul 8, 2005, at 2:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:23:52PM -0700, David Blevins wrote:
We can consider as a group if we want to hold up the branch for these
improvements [....]

Thoughs from the group?

So you guys want to wait or not? Not going to make this call by myself.


-David

-David

On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:45:30AM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Things I want to do for M4 (none of these need to hold up the branch): - see if we can eliminate class names from PK Generator configuration - get a release of ActiveMQ more recent than this afternoon (so our port
   list will show the ActiveMQ port)
 - fix the deployer to not echo your password
 - fix the deployer to not be totally silent
- give the deployer a custom message for the case where RuntimeDeployer
   is not deployed
 - make sure exceptions propogate to the deploy tool well

And "would be nice but don't plan to do this myself":
- have a sample web app set as the default so localhost:8080 doesn't 404
 - add a shutdown JAR, or management JAR with shutdown implemented
 - have startup/shutdown/deploy scripts
 - provide a bundled or linked MC4J release

Aaron

On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote:
Alright, it's been a few days since this was proposed, going to move forward as there didn't seem to be any objections.

  (As a note to people who really want to get
   features in before we release; good!  Let's
   release again very very soon!)


If you are in the middle of something, get to the end of it quick :)

If you were thinking of starting something big, wait till tomorrow at this time.

If you would prefer we delay creating the branch a day or two (and have good reason for holding up the show), speak up.

-David



Reply via email to