Options including "geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console" mean "add a directory called incubator next to trunk in Geronimo SVN and add the donation to a new subdirectory of that".
Options including "Send to Apache incubator" mean "add a new project to incubator.apache.org". I'm open to a new name for the Geronimo SVN subdirectory next to trunk. Aaron On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I think that the idea was that it actually does go through the Incubator. > > On 7/14/2005 10:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > could you please not call it "incubator"? It's not and it's > > confusing. I also think that we should be a little clearer on the > > guidelines for dealing with the options below (like the ongoing > > conversation). > > > > On Jul 14, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > >> Please vote for the disposition of the IBM web console: > >> > >> [ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers > >> [ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers > >> [ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers > >> [ ] Send to Apache incubator > >> [ ] Other (please specify) > >> > >> I don't know that we've preceisely defined a "restricted > >> committer", except insofar as we use an ACL so they can commit to their > >> incobator area but not to the rest of Geronimo. We also haven't > >> defined > >> how many committers we'd accept in either case. > >> > >> Still, it seems like the code is available (or quite close to it), > >> and we've had extensive discussions on the best general approach to > >> donated code, so I'd like to see if we can start to settle this and get > >> our hands on the console code. We can continue to work on our > >> expectations for "restricted committers" if the vote goes that way. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Aaron > >> > >> > > > > >
