On Aug 24, 2005, at 11:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 24, 2005, at 10:47 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 24, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We've shipped four non-certified Jetty distributions, let's go
ahead with a Tomcat distribution in the same vein. If we need
to go over some J2EE licensing requirements, let's do it on the
TCK list.
When we did that we only released one binary so there was no
ambiguity in the release. If the Jetty version of M5 is certified
and the Tomcat version isn't, it will be misleading to users.
-1 on any M5 binary that is not certified.
IIRC a release can not be vetoed except for a technical reason, so
this is a -1 opinion and not a official veto.
I am not in favor of releasing an uncertified tomcat version with a
certified jetty version. I would rather wait with the tomcat
version until we solve whatever tomcat problems show up. With
luck, this discussion will be moot due to the tomcat tests passing
without much problem.
Maybe we can hold off on tackling this issue till we can get some
concrete numbers from the TCK on Tomcat.
-David
