In principal, I agree with your comments about minimal, default and custom install, but I don't think this approach is necessary yet. Once you have the opportunity to try the installer I think you'll see what I mean. I could explain, but "a picture is worth a thousand words" as they say. There really are just a few options to select. Mixing and matching these options into various configuration matrices might actually be more confusing.
On Monday 19 December 2005 12:41, Heinz Drews wrote: > Hello Erik, > > the approach sounds just perfect. > > It would be great if the Installer would support a number of standard > configurations. > > e.g "Minimal", "Default", ... "Custom". > > Best regards, > Heinz > > On 12/19/05, Erik Daughtrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The next phase of the installer is supposed to only install selected > > components as well as activating them in config.xml. Currently, the > > installer installs all components and modifies config.xml to only start > > those selected at install time. > > > > My current plan is to make this an optional feature by adding somthing > > like a "Lean install" pack that can be selected. This way folks who > > happen to want everything installed, but only some parts configured can > > have the current functionality. > > > > Does anyone vehemently disagree with this approach? > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Erik -- Regards, Erik
