I will try to be patient. Can I get the Installer as Xmas gift :-)
On 12/19/05, Erik Daughtrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In principal, I agree with your comments about minimal, default and custom > install, but I don't think this approach is necessary yet. > Once you have the opportunity to try the installer I think you'll see what I > mean. I could explain, but "a picture is worth a thousand words" as they > say. > There really are just a few options to select. Mixing and matching these > options into various configuration matrices might actually be more confusing. > > On Monday 19 December 2005 12:41, Heinz Drews wrote: > > Hello Erik, > > > > the approach sounds just perfect. > > > > It would be great if the Installer would support a number of standard > > configurations. > > > > e.g "Minimal", "Default", ... "Custom". > > > > Best regards, > > Heinz > > > > On 12/19/05, Erik Daughtrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The next phase of the installer is supposed to only install selected > > > components as well as activating them in config.xml. Currently, the > > > installer installs all components and modifies config.xml to only start > > > those selected at install time. > > > > > > My current plan is to make this an optional feature by adding somthing > > > like a "Lean install" pack that can be selected. This way folks who > > > happen to want everything installed, but only some parts configured can > > > have the current functionality. > > > > > > Does anyone vehemently disagree with this approach? > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Erik > > -- > > Regards, > > Erik >
