Re: Restructuring top level pom.xml

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Jacek Laskowski wrote: 2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure we want to keep it structured this way ? Hi Prasad, It looks that we're quickly approaching Dave's idea when he had envisioned the modules listed in one place would require a lot of effort to maintain. I personally don't think we have since lost the time as I couldn't see it the first time while having read Dave's email. Now, we're finally more experienced to get the gist of what he was saying ;) I'm for changing the parent pom to include only a few modules with a few more submodules rather than keeping them all in it. If it doesn't work we can always restructure it again ;) Any comments before the change appears? Maybe the members of the children POMs' group ids could be named: org.apache.geronimo.applications org.apache.geronimo.modules Etc. Regards, Alan