Jeff, I believe you get to vote also, so you had three before alan
voted (although david didn't put an official "+1" in the email). :)
Ken, please correct me if I'm wrong.
-dain
On May 22, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Let me follow this up too with some support...
JIRA GERONIMO-2046 is a patch (by Bill Dudney) for the first swipe at
full replication using the session API. I want to apply the patch to
place the code into the sandbox, but I need the session API available.
We will need it in the new trunk, and thus was asking that it be
merged
for the new trunk from 1.2, so that we may push forward with this
first
swipe, since its a dependency.
I hope that helps.
I think I have 2 +1s (Dain and DJ)...need one more ;-)
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Let me make myself clear from my original message, since I think
there
is confusion as to what I was asking:
When I referred to 1.1, I placed into parenthesis, "the new trunk
version that is".
I only have intentions of it going into *some* trunk, assuming it
will
be the newly branded trunk based on 1.1. I did not want to build
this
off of 1.2-dead for obvious reasons.
I do *not* at all mean that this should go in the 1.1 release, and I
would -1 that myself...I just want it in the new trunk when its cut.
Jeff
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to merge it to the new trunk.
-0.5 to merge it into 1.1... I don't see any ready to move it
into 1.1.
There are no users or implementations yet. If someone writes one
for
1.1, they can ship a plugin containing the session apis.
-dain
On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched. I'm
not at
all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I
don't
think we should release an api that has not been proved to work
well.
thanks
david jencks
On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the
sandbox, but
will have a need for the session api ;-)
Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new
trunk
version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
Jeff
