To clarify,
+1 on new trunk after 1.1 is branched
-1 on inclusion in 1.1 release.
I actually don't understand why a vote on this is required. My
understanding is that we have all already agreed that all new stuff
in current trunk is part of future geronimo and the only question is
when to merge it back into the new 1.1-based trunk. This is already
work we have approved of by commit-then-review, why does it need to
be voted on?
thanks
david jencks
On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched. I'm not
at all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I
don't think we should release an api that has not been proved to
work well.
thanks
david jencks
On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the
sandbox, but
will have a need for the session api ;-)
Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new trunk
version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)
Jeff
