On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
Review-Then-Commit model for a couple of months now,
and I think the issues the change was intended to
highlight have been .. well, highlighted.
How do people feel about the idea of switching back
to Commit-Then-Review at this point?
I'd be more inclined to talk about what we want to apply it to and how.
That said, I've stared at this email for an hour after writing the
above sentence and am still not sure what the answer would be....
Part of me wouldn't mind seeing an RTC process where
- it's not enforced. meaning we could pull the plug whenever we like
- your +1 could simply mean you've reviewed it to your satisfaction
(whatever that means for you) and agree with the change.
Tempted to also throw in "three +1s from any committer other than the
proposer are sufficient", but if that's going to be a topic of
debate, I'd rather see it put on hold and the first two items
implemented first.
-David
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBROuM8prNPMCpn3XdAQJasgP6AmIwS/d8cS12D6ClRmeWAdbtkQIPFVsY
QvGXkS6/LhrNNKnA+vsKdOOE/dsPa9MaxlhBNqG4qN8Wz+gQMIj6zD5h+u20GG6W
LBmDilEYctBZtjTZ+WovEfweQbiAX4aRjWi/mClQzAvKIdMEAph4UmwYQy/F5FG0
anL4nJoStVw=
=XJ1j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
