I think we need to keep enough in there that the command-line deploy
tool still works.  It looks like online-deployer is empty (or else I
would have said to keep that), but I think j2ee-security is required
for the JMX remoting used by the deploy tool.  Without this, I think
you'll have to mangle the repository contents and config.xml by hand
in order to ever have more than "Micro G" (ick).

Anyway, I would also be in favor of separating the specs from RMI naming.

Thanks,
    Aaron

P.S. Maybe we should whack the online-deployer module and rename
"j2ee-security" to just "security" or something.

On 10/5/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I marked the ones to remove IMO  with an X

I seem to have a more extreme view of "micro" than you :-)
I'd also prefer to pull the specs out of rmi-naming into a separate
config so we can swap in the jee5 ones more easily.

thanks
david jencks

On Oct 5, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

>
> The following modules are currently included in micro-G.
> What of these should we attempt to remove yet from micro-G?
>
> X connector-deployer
> geronimo-gbean-deployer
> X hot-deployer
> X j2ee-deployer
> X j2ee-security
> X j2ee-server
> j2ee-system
> X online-deployer
> rmi-naming
> X sharedlib
> shutdown
> X transaction
> X unavailable-client-deployer
> X unavailable-ejb-deployer
> X unavailable-webservices-deployer
>
> I'd like to be able to remove the unavailable* deployers but at the
> moment I think they are pretty tightly tied to the j2ee-deployer
> which IIUC we need to keep since it is really not just for j2ee
> deployments. IIRC I attempted to remove j2ee-deployer earlier and
> discovered that I needed this to be able to deploy plugins into
> micro-G.  I think the other j2ee* modules are likewise required for
> more than just j2ee content.  Is this true?
>
> I think we might be able to remove hot-deployer ... any thoughts?
> My only concern is that if we get too fine grained then it gets
> difficult to build up the image to be equivalent for little-G or
> higher.  Right now to get from micro-G to little-G you need to
> deploy both the tomcat or jetty plugin and the corresponding
> deployer.  Removing hot-deployer will add another item to the
> list.  Thoughts?
>
> Joe
>
>


Reply via email to