On 10/29/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we'll position the J2G plugin > in the > future ?? I understand now that in its initial iteration that it is > narrowly > scoped to work for JBoss specific migrations only (thus the JBoss in the > name). > However, it seems if we want to eventually enhance it as a more generic > tool for > migrating multiple applications to Geronimo (which I would hope we would), > it > might be a good time now to reconsider a more generic and/or appropriate > name. > Any thoughts ?? >
I think it's a good idea to call it a "migration tool". We definitely should not be using the name "JBoss". j2g would be ok (though i'd be in favor of a generic name). --kevan
