Re: J2G future positioning

[Donald Woods]

I like a generic "Migrator" package name under devtools, so it leaves open the possibility for other app servers to Geronimo and to upgrade/migrate from previous Geronimo releases if we make major changes.

-Donald

Kevan Miller wrote:

On 10/29/07, *Tim McConnell* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi, Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we'll position the J2G
    plugin in the
    future ?? I understand now that in its initial iteration that it is
    narrowly
    scoped to work for JBoss specific migrations only (thus the JBoss in
    the name).
    However, it seems if we want to eventually enhance it as a more
    generic tool for
    migrating multiple applications to Geronimo (which I would hope we
    would), it
    might be a good time now to reconsider a more generic and/or
    appropriate name.
    Any thoughts ??




--kevan

I think it's a good idea to call it a "migration tool". We definitely should not be using the name "JBoss". j2g would be ok (though i'd be in favor of a generic name).

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature