I think the following two issues should be fixed for 2.1: 1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502 - this prevents a single assembly to have both cxf and axis2 installed (which we supported in 2.0.x)
2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3523 - can't do certain actions through the console on jetty. Jarek On 11/1/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Kevan Miller wrote: > > I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. > > > > There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. > > There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good > > to get a release out, with these capabilities. They provide a more solid > > platform for future enhancements, I think. > > > > There's also GShell and new monitoring capabilities. I'm probably > > missing a few other new functions. > > > > Finally, IIUC, 2.1 would be able to support a Terracotta plugin. I'd > > also be very interested to hear what WADI capabilities that could be > > exposed. > > > > I'm willing to bang the release manager drum. I see that Joe has already > > started tugging on the TCK chain > > > > What do others think? How close are we to a 2.1 release? What additional > > capabilities and bug fixes are needed? Can we wrap up development > > activities in the next week or two? > > I think it would be good to get 2.1 out before the Holidays and I think > that is reasonable. IMO we have enough function now to declare a release. > > Aside from getting tck passing and released version of current SNAPSHOT > dependencies ... I think we ought to get config.xml updated. With the > changes for the flexible server, config.xml is now being generated and > isn't quite as user friendly as it once was. I don't know much about > this area but I'll gladly help. There are also a few usability items > that I'd like to see if I can get in ... but they are not critical. > > Joe >
