On Feb 9, 2008 12:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 6:58 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Geronimo had a great year 2007. I don't need to re-list all our > > achievements listed in Matt's mail from 31st Dec 2007 > > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg54994.html). > Now > > that 2.1 is also rolling out, I think it is time we start discussing > what we > > want to do in Geronimo in year 2008. Let us also discuss what we "must" > do > > to make Geronimo an application server of choice. I would like all of > us to > > use this mail thread to put forth our thoughts (and any action items > some of > > us may have already come up with silently) so that the community can see > > what great heights Geronimo will scale in 2008. > > We certainly need more exposure in the tools area and having a > Geronimo NetBeans plugin is a way to go. Eclipse one's fine, but we > need to bring Geronimo to NetBeans masses and let them know there's > another application server with a name that starts with G which is > worth paying attention to as well. > > Documentation, documentation and no need to say more but documentation > is an absolute must.
In most cases, we have an associated JIRA for a new feature or a major bug fix. How about we designate the JIRA as resolved only after the related documentation is in place? Many a time we verify the code before closing the JIRA. It shouldn't be hard adding a wiki page with a small write up on how to use that feature or any work around provided. It can be a detailed document or an entry in an FAQ. This will also help in coming up with comprehensive docs after a release. > > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl >
