I'd like to get G4009 in if possible. I have provided a patch to fix some HTML errors and warnings, although the sample runs without this patch.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Joe Bohn wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples > (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)? > > > > I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've > already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process). > > > > Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the > 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date". > > > > I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new > process but I'll follow that up in another note. > > > > Joe > > > > > > BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing > references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct, > etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the samples. > Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that a particular > sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all? > > Joe > >
