Donald Woods wrote:
What about Daytrader? It's been dormant except for one update since
last Oct. and is still at version 2.0-SNAPSHOT....
Good point. My main motivation on the samples was to get something out
there for Geronimo 2.1 which I think is long overdue. However, it would
appear that daytrader is even more overdue.
Should we move it over into Samples, so it gets updated and released
with the samples?
We should get some more input on this. I don't recall all of the
reasons that daytrader was moved into it's own subproject. However, I
have to admit that I'm hesitant to include it in samples prior to a 2.1
samples release because I'm afraid it will make it next to impossible to
get something out soon.
Joe
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
already done some prep to get things updated for the new release
process).
Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release
the 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
process but I'll follow that up in another note.
Joe
BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are
correct, etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state
of the samples. Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some
reason that a particular sample under branches/2.1 should not be
released at all?
Joe
