Ted Kirby wrote:
I'd like to get G4009 in if possible. I have provided a patch to fix
some HTML errors and warnings, although the sample runs without this
patch.
Thanks Ted. I'll take a look at the patch.
Joe
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
process but I'll follow that up in another note.
Joe
BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the samples.
Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that a particular
sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
Joe
