We might want to think about updating derby. I believe we skipped over updating to previous releases because of a bug. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3545 for details. The issue is fixed in both the 10.3.3.0 release and the 10.4.1.3 release. I haven't really looked at them, so I don't know much about new functionality, but our current derby version is over 2 years old. Any thoughts?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing for 2.1.2 would be to upgrade to MyFaces 1.2.3. I helped > them verify this via the Geronimo TCK so I don't anticipate any problems. > > What other projects are at newer versions that we should consider picking > up for a 2.1.2 release? > > Joe > > > > Joe Bohn wrote: > >> Hey Kevan, >> >> I agree that it would be nice to get a 2.1.2 release out soon. I've seen >> a number of duplicate JIRAs reported that are already fixed in >> 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT. >> >> some more comments inline ... >> >> Kevan Miller wrote: >> >>> >>> Not a whole lot of discussion, so far. I'm going to leave this open a >>> while longer... Hoping we can see a few more opinions voiced. >>> >>> To date, we have identified the following non-server related work items: >>> >>> 1) New JavaMail release to pick up the recent fixes -- I totally agree. >>> Happy to see the cooperation between the Geronimo and James projects. Do we >>> think we're at a reasonable point for a new JavaMail release? >>> >> +1 ... agree that it would be good to get a javamail release and pick it >> up in 2.1.2. >> >>> 2) GEP 2.1.2 that supports Eclipse Ganymede -- I'd like to see this also. >>> However, I don't think this is a GEP discussion and need not occur prior to >>> our server release discussion. >>> >> Agree .. this doesn't really impact a server 2.1.2 release. >> >>> 3) TranQL Oracle RAC connector -- would be nice to see. Do we have an >>> expectation on when this could be provided? >>> 4) Release DayTrader 2.1 -- I'd like to see this, also. Anybody willing >>> to work on making this happen? I don't think that this is a hard requirement >>> for a 2.1.2 release. >>> >> I expect this would be independent of a 2.1.2 server release. >> >>> 5) Samples -- We're currently discussing a release of our samples. I'd >>> certainly expect that our samples will work on 2.1.2 and expect that we'll >>> test and verify this. >>> >> Hopefully this will be the case, but at the moment the samples are still >> tied to a specific server release. However, I think the samples issue can >> be handled independent of a 2.1.2 server release. >> >>> >>> One additional fixes that I'd like to see: >>> >>> GERONIMO-4131 Identifies an issue with our RA deployment. I think we >>> should get this fixed. >>> >>> There may be others. Will take a look at the Jira's. >>> >>> Any Release Manager volunteers? >>> >> >> Since this is still fresh in my mind from 2.1.1 I would be willing to act >> as the Release Manager again for 2.1.2 if there are no other volunteers. >> >> >>> --kevan >>> >>> >> >> > -- ~Jason Warner
