That should have been fixed back on Oct. 9 in r703291 by Jay.



-Donald


Ivan wrote:
Just find in the newest snapshot, after I manually install the dojo plugin, it has an extra folder "dojo", currently when we want the refer to dojo.js, the url will be /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js.
I suggest to repackage the dojo-mini.zip file.


2008/10/8 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>

    Hi Manu, Ok, making it optional sounds good.

    Lin

    On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
     > Hi Lin,
     >
     > I am using it in the EjbServer Portlet I am developing. But I guess
     > that it can also be made an optional console plugin
     >
     > Regards
     > Manu
     >
     > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
     >> Jay,
     >>
     >> Right, I don't know how far that work went either.
     >>
     >> Thus, I didn't include the dojo-tomcat/jetty6 in the new
     >> javaee5-tomcat/jetty plugin group(profile), which will be used to
     >> build the javaee5 assemblies.
     >>
     >> Lin
     >>
     >> n Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Jay D. McHugh
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
     >>> Lin,
     >>>
     >>> Someone was working on upgrading the views in Geronimo to use the
     >>> widgets in the new version of Dojo.  I don't know how far that
    work went.
     >>>
     >>> So, I believe you are correct that the legacy set are the only
    ones that
     >>> are currently in use.
     >>>
     >>> Jay
     >>>
     >>> Lin Sun wrote:
     >>>> I think these two portlets are using the
    dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6.
     >>>> Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6 as
     >>>> dependency.
     >>>>
     >>>> Lin
     >>>>
     >>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
     >>>>> I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need
    Dojo right
     >>>>> now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and
    let users
     >>>>> optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome
    portlet to include
     >>>>> some information about what optional Console plugins are
    available....
     >>>>>
     >>>>>
     >>>>> -Donald
     >>>>>
     >>>>>
     >>>>> Lin Sun wrote:
     >>>>>> Hi,
     >>>>>>
     >>>>>> I don't see dojo-tomcat/jetty6 is used by admin console
    right now in
     >>>>>> trunk thus I plan to remove it from the javaee5 assembly.   Any
     >>>>>> objection?
     >>>>>>
     >>>>>> Whenever we have converted some of our admin console to use
     >>>>>> dojo-tomcat/jetty6, dojo-tomcat/jetty6 should be
    automatically pulled
     >>>>>> into javaee5 assembly via transitive dependency, similar like
     >>>>>> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today.
     >>>>>>
     >>>>>> Lin
     >>>>>>
     >>>
     >>
     >




--
Ivan

Reply via email to