Yes I also notice this. An additional level is there currently. So its http://localhost:8080/dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js
Regards Manu On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Ivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the dojo webapp is deployed with the web context "dojo", so > http://localhost:8080/dojo <---(webapp context) / dojo <-- > (parent folder) / dojo <-- (sub folder, which has a brother folder "dijit") > / dojo.js > > 2008/10/15 Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Ivan, >> >> The location that you saw is correct (as of Dojo version 1.x). >> >> Ever since they (Dojo) began releases of Dojo that include dijit and >> dojox (those started with 0.9), they have nested those folders within a >> parent dojo folder. >> >> So, the folder structure should be: >> --dojo >> ----dojo >> dojo.js >> <everything else that base dojo needs> >> ----dijit >> <whatever is in dijit> >> >> And the path you would need to specify to access the dojo.js file would >> be: >> >> http://localhost:8080/dojo/dojo/dojo.js >> >> It still feels like an extra level of directories (to me also). But the >> only alternative to that would be for us to break apart the release from >> Dojo into multiple plugins. Then, there would be a dojo plugin and a >> dijit plugin. But for Geronimo's use of Dojo (and I would assume most >> others) the widgets are a big part of the draw - and splitting Dojo >> apart would be adding extra work to make things more complicated for us >> and users. >> >> Jay >> >> Ivan wrote: >> > After running mvn install on my local svn folder, I checked the file >> > dojo-tomcat-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car in the target folder, it has the same >> > structure >> > with the previous one. >> > >> > ---dojo---dojo >> > ---dijit >> > ---WEB-INF >> > ---MENTA-INF >> > >> > Adding the web context "dojo", I guess we still need >> > /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js, have I missed anything ? >> > >> > >> > 2008/10/14 Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> >> Ivan, >> >> >> >> Have you had a chance to try a newer snapshot? >> >> >> >> Is Dojo showing up in the correct location for you? >> >> >> >> Jay >> >> >> >> Ivan wrote: >> >>> Just find in the newest snapshot, after I manually install the dojo >> >> plugin, >> >>> it has an extra folder "dojo", currently when we want the refer to >> >> dojo.js, >> >>> the url will be /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js. >> >>> I suggest to repackage the dojo-mini.zip file. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2008/10/8 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> >> >>>> Hi Manu, Ok, making it optional sounds good. >> >>>> >> >>>> Lin >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Hi Lin, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I am using it in the EjbServer Portlet I am developing. But I guess >> >>>>> that it can also be made an optional console plugin >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Regards >> >>>>> Manu >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> Jay, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Right, I don't know how far that work went either. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thus, I didn't include the dojo-tomcat/jetty6 in the new >> >>>>>> javaee5-tomcat/jetty plugin group(profile), which will be used to >> >>>>>> build the javaee5 assemblies. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Lin >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> n Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Lin, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Someone was working on upgrading the views in Geronimo to use the >> >>>>>>> widgets in the new version of Dojo. I don't know how far that >> >>>>>>> work >> >>>> went. >> >>>>>>> So, I believe you are correct that the legacy set are the only >> >>>>>>> ones >> >>>> that >> >>>>>>> are currently in use. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Jay >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote: >> >>>>>>>> I think these two portlets are using the >> >>>>>>>> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6. >> >>>>>>>> Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6 as >> >>>>>>>> dependency. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Lin >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need >> >>>>>>>>> Dojo >> >>>> right >> >>>>>>>>> now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and let >> >> users >> >>>>>>>>> optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome portlet >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>> include >> >>>>>>>>> some information about what optional Console plugins are >> >>>> available.... >> >>>>>>>>> -Donald >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I don't see dojo-tomcat/jetty6 is used by admin console right >> >>>>>>>>>> now >> >> in >> >>>>>>>>>> trunk thus I plan to remove it from the javaee5 assembly. Any >> >>>>>>>>>> objection? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Whenever we have converted some of our admin console to use >> >>>>>>>>>> dojo-tomcat/jetty6, dojo-tomcat/jetty6 should be automatically >> >>>> pulled >> >>>>>>>>>> into javaee5 assembly via transitive dependency, similar like >> >>>>>>>>>> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Lin >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Ivan >
