Ivan, Have you had a chance to try a newer snapshot?
Is Dojo showing up in the correct location for you? Jay Ivan wrote: > Just find in the newest snapshot, after I manually install the dojo plugin, > it has an extra folder "dojo", currently when we want the refer to dojo.js, > the url will be /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js. > I suggest to repackage the dojo-mini.zip file. > > > 2008/10/8 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hi Manu, Ok, making it optional sounds good. >> >> Lin >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Lin, >>> >>> I am using it in the EjbServer Portlet I am developing. But I guess >>> that it can also be made an optional console plugin >>> >>> Regards >>> Manu >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Jay, >>>> >>>> Right, I don't know how far that work went either. >>>> >>>> Thus, I didn't include the dojo-tomcat/jetty6 in the new >>>> javaee5-tomcat/jetty plugin group(profile), which will be used to >>>> build the javaee5 assemblies. >>>> >>>> Lin >>>> >>>> n Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>>> Lin, >>>>> >>>>> Someone was working on upgrading the views in Geronimo to use the >>>>> widgets in the new version of Dojo. I don't know how far that work >> went. >>>>> So, I believe you are correct that the legacy set are the only ones >> that >>>>> are currently in use. >>>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>> Lin Sun wrote: >>>>>> I think these two portlets are using the dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6. >>>>>> Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6 as >>>>>> dependency. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need Dojo >> right >>>>>>> now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and let users >>>>>>> optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome portlet to >> include >>>>>>> some information about what optional Console plugins are >> available.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Donald >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lin Sun wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't see dojo-tomcat/jetty6 is used by admin console right now in >>>>>>>> trunk thus I plan to remove it from the javaee5 assembly. Any >>>>>>>> objection? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whenever we have converted some of our admin console to use >>>>>>>> dojo-tomcat/jetty6, dojo-tomcat/jetty6 should be automatically >> pulled >>>>>>>> into javaee5 assembly via transitive dependency, similar like >>>>>>>> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lin >>>>>>>> > > >
