On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:08 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yup, this is a problem. So far we've sidestepped it by just adding all the > known desired MBE's to the appropriate *-deployer plan, and as you have > found this is non-extensible. > > One possiblitly would be to define marker interfaces such as WebMBE, EjbMBE, > etc that the appropriate MBE's could implement and use the interface in the > references pattern.
+1 to that idea. This was/is a problem for a long time and needs to be fixed. Jarek
