Personally, I'd like a bugfix release each month or so. I like frequent releases. Firefox 3 is at 3.0.11 now, albeit mostly with security fixes. But I also understand the points you made. On the other hand people trust more a x.1 version than an x.0 version, so a Geronimo 2.1.20 would give the impression of a very stable version with many bugs fixed (as does Tomcat 6.0.20).
The rare updates of Geronimo with rare news make the website a bit un-active, it looks like there is not a lot happening with the project. http://directory.apache.org/ -> news looks much more active with their mix of new features and honorable mentions. Thanks, Juergen Rex Wang-2 wrote: > > How frequent do you think is the most appropriate for Geronimo? > IMHO, too more releases in a year might give users the impression that the > production is very young and not stable. > > > Thank you > -Rex > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Update-the-2.2-release-status-page--tp24030920s134p24071422.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
