Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean GERONIMO-4625<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603>
2009/9/11 Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com> > I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801 > Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted > exception > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821 > Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836 > If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that > will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493 > I am working on it, and it will be finished soon > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603 > I am working on it, and it will be finished soon > > Thanks ! > > 2009/9/11 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > > We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had >> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very >> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our >> snapshot dependencies. >> >> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to >> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on >> and an estimate for completion. >> >> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2 >> please reply and describe what you'd like. >> >> many thanks >> david jencks >> >> > > > -- > Ivan > -- Ivan
